What to do if you are out of work after the long vacation? Let's take a look at other people's bad luck and be happy.

　　 Not long ago, after a 16-month investigation and a 440-page report, the US Congress determined that Google, Apple, Amazon, and Facebook have "monopoly powers" in key business areas and abused their dominant position in the market.

　　 This means high fines, or risk of splitting, so the "Big Macs" are also a bit unwilling to sit still, and have begun to "whitewash" themselves:

　　 Google issued a statement that "its own competition is fair." Facebook has raised its own success to the "American Dream". Amazon said that it only accounts for less than 1% of the global retail market, and Apple has "strongly opposed it."

　　 Even though antitrust investigations from Europe, America and other countries have been frequently conducted in recent years, it can be seen from the hearings that this time it really caused the giants to be a little overwhelmed.

　　 "Strikes out" satisfies the people who eat melons, but it has long become an "anti-monopoly" for countries to interfere with the economy and is not without controversy.

For a long time, some economists have taken another view that inappropriate anti-monopoly and splitting oligarchs, such as the Microsoft case of the year, will directly frustrate their vigor, affect corporate efficiency, and become a tool of economic nationalism. European law enforcement against Silicon Valley Internet giants is considered to suppress the advantages of the United States in the Internet industry, rather than "right light."

　　 The anti-monopoly wave of Internet technology companies has also given us an opportunity to re-examine this intervention method.

　　Tech giants replace the old trusts,